
Pins on a Map: Hollin Hills, Virginia
A singular community straddles America's cultural divide.
By Will Collins, November 13, 2008
Cast adrift amid the boring colonial subdivisions of Northern Virginia, an enclave of hippie modernism uncomfortably straddles the Red State-Blue State divide. Conceptualized by a community-minded developer and designed by a student of Frank Lloyd Wright’s, Hollin Hills is immediately recognizable as “that neighborhood,” or “the one with all the funny looking houses.” Although the community’s original voter registration rolls reveal eight times as many Democrats as Republicans, the neighborhood’s character is an odd mix of conservative and liberal tendencies.
Hollin Hills is a modernist development best known for its houses’ sparse, angular designs, massive windows, and lush yards. Founded in 1949 as a community-oriented alternative to the rash of cookie-cutter developments springing up around D.C., the neighborhood has managed to retain its unique aesthetic for over half a century. “Still contemporary after all these years” is favorite saying of long-time residents.
In many respects, Hollin Hills represents the best of upscale liberalism. The neighborhood’s open and friendly character has always encouraged a great deal of community participation. The Civic Association is active to the point of nosiness: we maintain our own parkland at the expense of residents’ time and money, and group projects like the House and Garden Tour and the annual pool clean-up always benefit from a surfeit of goodwill and volunteers. Taken as a neighborhood, Hollin Hills is the living embodiment of a tolerant, liberal community that hasn’t yet lost itself to suburban alienation.
Republicans still smarting from a McCain defeat will undoubtedly find a lot to dislike about Hollin Hills. The number of hybrids has grown exponentially in recent years, but whatever carbon emissions they conserve are promptly offset by the hulking Beemers and Mercedes parked next door. We keep compost piles and plant gardens, but our luxuriant windows send air conditioning bills through the roof. Having heard my mother’s book club discuss politics, I can also attest to the fact that certain community organizations are about as ideologically diverse as Maoist cadres. If the Elitist Liberal Snob is thought of as an exclusively urban species, the continued existence of Hollin Hills suggests otherwise.
But despite all the Priuses and the parkland, certain neighborhood traits are best described as idiosyncratically conservative. It may sound slightly absurd to accuse a modernist community of staunch traditionalism, but Hollin Hills’ Design Review Board is absolutely draconian when it comes to approving homeowners’ additions. Building a fence or garage is rarely allowed, and removing too many of our ancient trees is sure to provoke the neighbors’ ire. Every new deck, porch, or shed has to be approved as an organic outgrowth of the neighborhood’s founding aesthetic.
A few conventionally conservative habits are also on display. Our Fourth of July celebration is always a raucous, patriotic affair. Firearms are few and far between, but we like our big backyards and our privacy as much as any McMansion dweller. At the height of the presidential election, my mother was horrified to discover a few McCain/Palin signs down the road. The community’s stubborn refusal to add sidewalks also hints at a hidden libertarian streak.
Having braved the endless expanse of Northern Virginia’s barren exurbs, I realize how lucky I am to have grown up in a neighborhood that wasn’t strip-mined into existence. Our community was built to blend into the landscape, not to dominate it, and it’s a welcome change of pace from suburban malls and massive colonial fortresses. A skeptic might reply that trees are all well and good, but that sort of thing takes money, and people just aren’t interested in “blending in.” Given the choice, I’ll take shade and shrubbery over soil erosion and saplings, but it should also be noted that Hollin Hills began as a low-cost alternative for middle-class families.
Under the Design Review Board’s watchful eye, I doubt any newcomers will threaten the neighborhood’s architectural heritage. And despite the offending McCain-Palin paraphernalia, I’m equally confident that Hollin Hills went overwhelmingly Democratic on November 4. Disgruntled conservatives may deride us as liberal carpet-baggers, but the neighborhood was navy blue long before Obama captivated the D.C. suburbs. If anything, Hollin Hills’ continued success hints at a few deeper conservative truths: the importance of community, the value of preserving a certain shared aesthetic, and the existence of a profound, almost spiritual attachment to our land.
Will Collins lives in fake Virginia. He blogs occasionally at Dispatches.
Hollin Hills is a modernist development best known for its houses’ sparse, angular designs, massive windows, and lush yards. Founded in 1949 as a community-oriented alternative to the rash of cookie-cutter developments springing up around D.C., the neighborhood has managed to retain its unique aesthetic for over half a century. “Still contemporary after all these years” is favorite saying of long-time residents.
In many respects, Hollin Hills represents the best of upscale liberalism. The neighborhood’s open and friendly character has always encouraged a great deal of community participation. The Civic Association is active to the point of nosiness: we maintain our own parkland at the expense of residents’ time and money, and group projects like the House and Garden Tour and the annual pool clean-up always benefit from a surfeit of goodwill and volunteers. Taken as a neighborhood, Hollin Hills is the living embodiment of a tolerant, liberal community that hasn’t yet lost itself to suburban alienation.
Republicans still smarting from a McCain defeat will undoubtedly find a lot to dislike about Hollin Hills. The number of hybrids has grown exponentially in recent years, but whatever carbon emissions they conserve are promptly offset by the hulking Beemers and Mercedes parked next door. We keep compost piles and plant gardens, but our luxuriant windows send air conditioning bills through the roof. Having heard my mother’s book club discuss politics, I can also attest to the fact that certain community organizations are about as ideologically diverse as Maoist cadres. If the Elitist Liberal Snob is thought of as an exclusively urban species, the continued existence of Hollin Hills suggests otherwise.
But despite all the Priuses and the parkland, certain neighborhood traits are best described as idiosyncratically conservative. It may sound slightly absurd to accuse a modernist community of staunch traditionalism, but Hollin Hills’ Design Review Board is absolutely draconian when it comes to approving homeowners’ additions. Building a fence or garage is rarely allowed, and removing too many of our ancient trees is sure to provoke the neighbors’ ire. Every new deck, porch, or shed has to be approved as an organic outgrowth of the neighborhood’s founding aesthetic.
A few conventionally conservative habits are also on display. Our Fourth of July celebration is always a raucous, patriotic affair. Firearms are few and far between, but we like our big backyards and our privacy as much as any McMansion dweller. At the height of the presidential election, my mother was horrified to discover a few McCain/Palin signs down the road. The community’s stubborn refusal to add sidewalks also hints at a hidden libertarian streak.
Having braved the endless expanse of Northern Virginia’s barren exurbs, I realize how lucky I am to have grown up in a neighborhood that wasn’t strip-mined into existence. Our community was built to blend into the landscape, not to dominate it, and it’s a welcome change of pace from suburban malls and massive colonial fortresses. A skeptic might reply that trees are all well and good, but that sort of thing takes money, and people just aren’t interested in “blending in.” Given the choice, I’ll take shade and shrubbery over soil erosion and saplings, but it should also be noted that Hollin Hills began as a low-cost alternative for middle-class families.
Under the Design Review Board’s watchful eye, I doubt any newcomers will threaten the neighborhood’s architectural heritage. And despite the offending McCain-Palin paraphernalia, I’m equally confident that Hollin Hills went overwhelmingly Democratic on November 4. Disgruntled conservatives may deride us as liberal carpet-baggers, but the neighborhood was navy blue long before Obama captivated the D.C. suburbs. If anything, Hollin Hills’ continued success hints at a few deeper conservative truths: the importance of community, the value of preserving a certain shared aesthetic, and the existence of a profound, almost spiritual attachment to our land.
Will Collins lives in fake Virginia. He blogs occasionally at Dispatches.
Rating:

Comments
| Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 Comments |
Joseph de Maistre
November 19, 2008 10:41 am
No sidewalks? Every house hidden behind a bunch of trees? This place sounds like the very antithesis of neighborhood and community. It seems designed to reduce interaction between neighbors to exactly zero.
This is just an upscale, relatively more expensive version of the same suburban concept you see everywhere else -- low density, segregation of uses, everyone a slave to the automobile.
Will Collins
November 19, 2008 12:05 pm
Joseph:
I think that's a bit unfair. I don't know of any other suburb that maintains its own parkland and encourages a comparable range of social activities. I also think that the neighborhood's communal atmosphere is organically related to its aesthetic. Here's an entry from the neighborhood blog that capture this:
"In a reply a while back to a post, one person wrote that she moved here for the community, not the design. Yet so many of the elements of the design are just what makes this communtiy so open, and all of us a bit vulnerable. We can’t hole up behind eight-foot fences. The borrowed vistas, the open floor plans, the walls of glass keep us connected to each other. This design isn’t for everyone. Let those who love their colonials live in them. Those who like openness, simplicity, and connections to nature do well here, and I think they find themselves in the company of others of a similar bent. So, I think, many of us may have found our way here because we loved the houses, but then found out once we were here that the design created one of the most incredible communities in the country."
Corey McGee
November 19, 2008 12:48 pm
Will- Cool article, although I think when a Frank Lloyd Wright (or designs inspired by him) ages, it begins to look a bit "ugly" and I think that's what's happened with many of the homes in Hollin Hills. To be sure, the open land makes for a beautiful neighborhood, with a lot of great people in it. But there's something oddly unsettling, and reminiscent of flannel shirter Vermont, when you drive past or through architecturally bucolic suburbs like Hollin Hills and the most prominent sign in the neighborhood is for a Unitarian Universalist "church" (indeed, the alliterative use of "u" words meaning "of one mind" is annoying enough). I suppose this is the reason why I find old FLW's uglier than an old colonial: there's something very artificial and even contradictory about an "organic architecture," because as a compliment to nature it must age (and cannot renew itself like nature) but it also asserts very little. In contrast, the rational, symmetric colonials have little pretension as to their artifice. To borrow from Alain de Botton ("The Architecture of Happiness"), a home in Hollin Hills might try tell you it's a part of nature, while the colinials in, say, Riverside Gardens (I wonder who grew up there...), would simply tell you that they're houses. Alright, enough pedantry for today.
Will Collins
November 19, 2008 2:59 pm
Corey -
Artifice has always been a feature of architecture, from the Parthenon on down. So it's more a question of whether the designers' sleights of hand enhance livability and community. I suppose it's possible to turn a Hollin Hills house into a lifeless shrine to modernist architecture. But I suspect most residents live there because they recognize the community's defining features enhance hearth and home.
Colonials, of course, are their own brand of artifice. No matter where they pop up, they hearken back to some romanticized vision of America's past. If that sort of thing floats your boat, I won't object, but I think it's worth remembering that colonial architecture is the product of a certain context that may not be appropriate for the rash of exurbs springing up around the Beltway.
PS - If you think FLW's Falling Water hasn't aged well, you've passed the peace pipe with the Unitarian congregation a few too many times.
Joseph de Maistre
November 19, 2008 1:19 pm
Will - okay, Hollin Hills may have a strong sense of community and civic engagement. But how is this achieved? I'm guessing it's by restricting land use to such an extent that only affluent, like-minded whites can afford to live there. Rich people segregating themselves is obviously not a model that can be replicated.
Will Collins
November 19, 2008 2:47 pm
As I note in the article, Hollin Hills was originally conceptualized as a low-cost alternative for middle income families. Many of the original materials - used bricks, aluminum and tin, wood paneling - were actually chosen for reasons of cost-effectiveness, not aesthetics. Granted, the neighborhood has acquired a certain cachet and is now a lot more expensive. But idea behind Hollin Hills is easily transferable to new developments.
Joseph de Maistre
November 19, 2008 6:50 pm
I conclude that a suburb can enhance its sense of community by adding "special sauce" design ingredients that make the place a little more distinctive than the average suburb. Still, even in a special sauce suburban, the problems that plague suburbs generally still remain: you can't get anywhere without an automobile and there is no legible public space.
Most Popular
Culture11 Poll
Where do you get the majority of your news?





















